The FBI contacted a woguy that had composed a examine on a closed account. The FBI was sent out to interwatch the woguy because her bank that had the closed checking account called the FBI to go and ask the woguy what her intent was in creating checks on the closed account. The woman was not home when the FBI got tright here. They left an alert for her to contact them. She sent them a letter (or fax) containing the complying with. Tbelow was a presumption by her financial institution that she was doing somepoint wrong. The visit by the FBI was an implied "charge" versus her. The visit by the FBI was actually an implied "show cause" hearing as to why she need to not be previously carried up on expush charges of some crime involving the closed account checks she had composed. She could not make a statement in the letter or appearance to the merits of the implied charge of an impropriety concerning the closed account checks or else it would certainly be testimony and also she would be the "debtor" or looser in the matter. She might not protect against contacting the FBI after they left the message. That would certainly be a dishonor which would certainly exhaust the FBI"s attempt to ministerialy exhaust their remedies. She would be in dishonor, and also that would provide witness to the presumption being true and factual. She chosen to ask concerns in the letter that came to be the response to reyet any kind of presumption that she remained in any type of dishonor or impropriety concerning her actions via the closed account checks. She said:1) I accept all facts in your statement that I have written checks on a closed account. I accept that the account in question with the bank is closed. 2) I conditionally accept for worth and also rerotate for value the presumption I have a duty to show reason for my actions via the financial institution upon proof of case that it is not public plan of the UNITED STATES under HJRI92 to not pay debts at legislation but instead to exchange consideration upon a dollar for dollar basis to discharge a licapability.3) I conditionally accept for value and also rerevolve for worth the presumption I have a duty to present reason for my actions with the financial institution upon proof of insurance claim that without money of account (as establimelted under Blog post One, Section 10, clause one, of the Constitution of the United States of America) in circulation that the only commercial consideration that exists is each and every person"s exemption by method of a prepassist account operated by the USA Secretary of Treasury.4) I conditionally accept for worth and return for worth the presumption I have actually a duty to show reason for my actions via the financial institution upon proof of insurance claim that a person does not have actually the capacity and standing to authorize the usage of his individual exemption to discharge liabilities through the approval of the Secretary of the Treasury.5) I conditionally accept for value and return for value the presumption I have a duty to show cause for my actions with the financial institution upon proof of case that you have actually straight understanding that the Secretary of the Treasury or my bank has/have actually issued a Certificate of Protest on any instruments drafted by me and also directed to my financial institution or the Secretary of the Treasury as a fiduciary creditor and drawee(s).I repursuit that you please serve with me the Certificate of Protest from the Secretary of Treasury or my bank, if one exists on any type of of my drafts, so I deserve to observe any error or mistake and also correct shelp dishonor, if one exists. END OF WRITTEN LETTER!The jist of the above communication is that it shows the FBI investigators that you are operating under official Public Policy set forth by the UNITED STATES when the UNITED STATES confiscated all the lawful money of account in circulation in 1933 and also it was now difficult to pay any type of debts with publicly sanctioned money under the provision of the United States Constitution, Article One, Section ten, Clausage one. In rerotate for the confiscation of the lawful money, the UNITED STATES came to be liable to pay the debts of the civilization as fiduciary creditors (agents) of the world. Since all commercial power in visibility comes from the mental and physical powers of the living people, and also not from corporations or federal government, it is these living civilization that are the lenders or creditors to every one of culture. In rerevolve for the loans from the human being, the UNITED STATES keeps track of these loans from the human being by tracking the "contributions" of the strawmen- i.e. the corporate shadows of the people, by means of what the UNITED STATES calls the Social Security Number accounts. Due to the fact that all donations (or loans) of commercial assets from the civilization to the UNITED STATES are accounted for by method of the SSN accounting, the UNITED STATES knows at any kind of one time how much it owes the ultimate creditors, the living human being. Many human being believe that the SSN was produced to enservant the world by making them takers of benefits. This is false (unless you desire it to be true and also demand benefits from the UNITED STATES). Everything from the BANKRUPT public under public plan and also not under public law is told to us in reverse or backwards. The development of the SSN accounts was not to make us a country of slaves. It was to permit the government to take our commercial energy and usage it to run the country, while at the same time not being guilty of fraud or theft. The federal government essential to account for exactly how much commercial energy it owed each and everyone of us, the ultimate creditors, for our contribution. Because of this, the SSN wregarding track our clintends against the UNITED STATES. We are the creditors and also they are the debtor. Because of this, we have a pre-passist account with the UNITED STATES since we are the creditors and also it is the debtor. The CAFR accounting is the summary outcomes of this accountancy of maintaining track of the people"s contributions and also revenue on those contributions. There are two accounts. The one account is the bookkeeping of the initially tier contributions. This is the building contributed to the UNITED STATES from the human being of the says by way of the acts of the governors of the states in March of 1933. The larger asset account is a lot of likely the income off of the commercial investment of the assets added to the initially account. This second dealing with the investment income is the majority of most likely a tontine account belonging to the people, as long as they are alive to claim it. After their death, their share of this account is most likely estopped with their probate. Living people loan or add credits to the UNITED STATES once they very own residential or commercial property and register it, or once they have revenue and file a taxes return. You are in commerce when you have actually income (i.e.- you market the labor of the living male for private money) or as soon as you are an "owner" of registered residential or commercial property. Title 31 USA Code §3124 is interesting. It is titled "Exemption from Taxation." This statute claims in impact that you are not exempt from taxation under Title 26 of the United States Code if you offer your labor or if you very own home that is registered to any state or the united states. Notice that Title 31 of the United States Code is the legislations concerning "money". Because there is no public legislation money now, and just private money of the private Federal Reserve Bank, then tright here is no ability to purchase any kind of titles to any type of building anymore. Because tright here is no ability to purchase titles to residential property anymore with the private Federal Reserve Notes, then one"s "ownership" or residential property or the sale of one"s labor for exclusive "money" has actually no lawful title moved in the exadjust. As such one is always dealing with a "federal" home right in any "ownership" or in any type of "sale of labor for ‘money". Since one is dealing in a building right of Congress (considering that they enfranchised the Federal Reserve Bank), then one that sells his labor for "money" or owns home is nopoint more than a tenant on the federal feudal plantation and is NOT taxation exempt from the statutes of Title 26 pointed out in Title 31 §3124 and also being outside the exemption. The taxation is the rent for the usage of the federal feudal property organized by the UNITED STATES in trust for the people and franchised to the federal 1fourth amendment fictions and also corporations to raise a revenue for the democracy.Tbelow is a court situation that claims the exact same thing. It is backward to reality, however the fact is tbelow anymethod. The agents of the court soptimal as the agents of YHWH to His world, if they will listen. Scripture states in 1 Cor 13:12: For Now we check out via a glass, darkly; yet then face to face: currently I recognize in part: however then shall I recognize even as likewise I am well-known," The "glass" is a mirror that inverts the direction from left to appropriate. "Darkly" is the modifier that suggests that the image from the mirror is not quickly discernible even once it is in reverse. The Court situation is from the UNITED STATES Supreme Court. "If the nation comes down from its place of sovereignty and enters the domain of business, it submit itself to the very same laws that govern individuals therein. It assumes the place of an plain citizen and also it cannot recede from the fulfillment of its obligations;" 74 Fed. Rep. 145, following 91 UNITED STATE 398. Notice that the words in the brackets have been included by the writer. It is not in the original decision. This instance was a commercial instance in which the sovereignty of the USA was draw into question. The Supreme Court shelp that once a sovereign goes right into a commercial relationship with private money , it looses its sovereignty. The Supreme Court was telling you that we all shed our sovereignty in 1933 as soon as we went into commerce with personal FRN"s that did not secure title to the goods purchased. Title remained with the "state" under the principle of escwarm. The just means to remain sovereign is to be out of commercial task.It is interesting that tright here is something called a COMMERCIAL ACTIVITY EXCEPTION. Black"s Law Thesaurus, Seventh, states: the - term "commercial-activity exception means: "An exemption from the ascendancy of sovepower immunity, permitting a case versus a international state if the case arises from private acts undertaken by the foreign state, as opposed to the state"s public acts." Isn"t this definition specifically what we said over. If you are in business considering that 1933, you are not a sovepower. You are not cost-free. Prior to 1933, you could perform a "public act" of "paying" for goods and also solutions via lawful money of account. In 1933 that "public act" was suspended by federal public policy of the bankruptcy. Now all one can do is to usage a "exclusive act" of discharging your debt via FRN"s, which are not a money and execute not purchase a title for the items and services you bought. Thus, none of your acts are cloaked via the security of a "sovereign" anyeven more. You shed your presumption of "sovereignty" because of your participation in personal commercial task.Let me put this a various method. It comes out the very same in the end. The UNITED STATES has actually been bankrupt from the beginning. It has actually only been in assorted stperiods of bankruptcy going from poor to worse. The Constitution was the first indicator. If you look up the word "constitution", it will certainly give you all kinds of comfy-cozy stuff. It will certainly make you feel great around this "beginning document". If you look up the word "constitutor" you will gain a readjusted opinion. A "constitutor" is one who passes on his debts to an additional by method of the constitution he writes, so it was through the UNITED STATES. It owed the debts of the Revolutionary War earlier in the 1770"s. The States would not taxation themselves to pay these debts. Congress, under the Articles of Confederation, borrowed money from the worldwide bankers to pay these battle debts. The Constitution was the implies of getting the States to coincertain the UNITED STATES in order to gain an extension in paying ago the loan to the creditors at the end of the 1780"s. The States became endorsers and also co-sureties on the national loan. This cosurety was referred to as in in 1933 once the assets of the States were turned over to the UNITED STATES to help discharge the bankruptcy. This was done bereason of the Constitution of the United States and also pursuant thereto. If you execute not believe this, then I will provide you an additional worry to think about. Tbelow is a principle called the Rule of 93. It relates to the Rule of 1793 under Internationwide Law. "Wbelow a commerce which had previously been considered a monopoly is thrvery own open, in times of war, to all nations, by a basic regulation neutrals have actually no ideal to avail themselves of the concession, and their entrance on such trade is a breach of the impartiality they are bound to observe." 2 Halleck, mt. L. 302. This ascendancy came right into presence between the Treaties of 1783 and also 1794, even more typically termed the Treaty of Peace and the Jay Treaty. The first Treaty of Peace signed in July 16, 1792 well-known the debt that Congress had actually via the bankers of the Crown of England also payable by Jan. 1, 1788, yet defaulted on by Congress. This Rule of 93 states that anyone that acts in a commercial manner through one who is a debtor to another, is no longer a neutral party and also stands in the area of the debtor.This is the source of our trouble today, world. The UNITED STATES and also all the states are codebtors to the bankers. We, the people, were never attached directly through the duty to discharge the debt. But when we go right into a commercial activity via personal "money" via the debtors the UNITED STATES and the territorial Buck Act States, then we are no much longer neutral, under law, and we have actually come right into breach of the impartiality in the commercial connection in between the UNITED STATES and its Buck Act States and the global creditor banks. By our co-commercial activity under private acts of business by making use of private crmodify and debt, we have actually come to be the debtors by our actions. The only solution is to get out of business with exclusive federal "money".This is wright here the "closed check" account becomes amazing. When the account is closed, one have the right to access the asset side of the admiralty-maritime pre-paid account. If one cannot access the ascollection side, then one cannot obtain the right of the creditor to the activity. The liability side is the proof of a debt. A debtor has no remedy in an activity. Dealing through open up checking accounts is reserved is for "dead" entities who have actually no original energy. If you are a living spirit, you are the resource of the power used by commerce. You are the creditor or the principle.Tbelow is NO MONEY. It was discontinued by an act of Congress in 1933. All we have is the PROMISE to supply money, if and also when it is ever restored, which President Johnson sassist would never be restored aacquire. If you think that tright here is money, then you are a fool and live in a fiction as a lunatic. Tbelow are points that some world want you to think is offered "as a money". If money existed, you would not need to have "notes" and also promises to pay money. How deserve to the promise to pay money be the money you think you are getting?The lengthy and short is straightforward. You never PAY anyone any money. You hand also them a due bill to promise to pay them somepoint which does not now exist and to which those in power will not sanction. The factor is simple. If you execute not have actually money, you deserve to not get a title to any type of property. As such, all residential property rests in the hands of the fictitious state which owns everything and you should acquire permission from the state to perform whatever before you desire to execute. This is referred to as a democracy which is run on the commercial ethics of socialism . We, as a country, were taken over in March, 1933, and also not one citizen or servant was the wiser and objected. But who cares? The reason was declared in Deuteronomy 28 and also Leviticus 26.The factor for our nation"s existing problem is not pertinent to this discussion. We are interested in the problem of the woman, that in the start of this post, was associated through a visit from the FBI to inquire about why she was utilizing closed checks on a closed checking account.A closed account in a bank is one which allows one to go back to draft the UNITED STATES to protest the absence of remedy to the loss of Constitutional money. It requests the usage of "public" plan to remedy your loss of lawful money as a living civilization and also as a creditor of the commercial bankruptcy. By drafting through a closed account check, provided in a proper manner, one have the right to notification the Secretary of the Treasury that you research a "public act" of negotiation of an account someone could charge you with under "exclusive acts" of public policy. Using the closed check appropriately actually puts one in harmony through the principles of HJR 192 as set forth by Congress in 1933 as the remedy for the "creditors", or we the human being. You are NOT making use of the closed check to purchase anything. Tright here is no money. You are involved in an exchange. An exreadjust is an action between two parties wright here goods or solutions are neither bought or offered and are not gifted. Remember, tright here is a taxation or a lawful penalty on gifting or buying and also selling as soon as the commercial system is run under international personal acts or laws. This is the penalty stated in the Rule of 1793 whereby traders in commerce with the debtors are also treated like the debtors and lose all titles and also building legal rights not granted by letters of Marquee (licenses and also registrations), to which the party in commerce never before has actually lawful title. He is merely a beneficiary to an implied trust via the "state" as the lawful trustee through the appropriate of control.When the womale in our instance used a closed account check to tender a charge, she was not paying the charge. There is no money. It is a fiction and also illusion to assume tbelow is. She was merely informing the so called charging party that if they desire to believe tright here is money, or if they want to think that tbelow is a charge versus her straw-womale, then she will not argue via them. Why would you argue via an insane person who believes that tright here is money once Congress told everyone tright here wasn"t in 1933. To argue via a lunatic that believes that tbelow is money and also that they deserve to charge you to try to collect money which does not exist, is to become a lunatic yourself. The test in this scenario is that the controllers for the government at the high level understand there is no money. They test you to see if you think that there is still money. If you are through them that you perform not owe MONEY, then you are the one who increased the factual problem of MONEY, and you should be a lunatic. Their judgments against you for money is another test to see if they can appease you, since you obviously think money exists.So lets number this out. If you argue about a debt payable in money, such as a civil or criminal charge against you, then you are a lunatic considering that you appear to believe that money exists, which given that 1933 is not true. You need to be crazy. If you "accept" any alleged charges that they suggest are concerned money , and you never before raise the problem of money at all, since it is a fiction and illusion and also you perform not resolve, talk about, or argue points that are illusions and also fictions, then you pass the test from the public, and you just might escape any type of significant judgments for criminal or civil liabilities that will certainly be thrown at your strawguy.The means that you obtain out of business and do not usage money is to authorize the Secretary of the Treasury to offset and change any type of charges against your strawman by the use of an "exemption" by means of a PRE-PAID account, which links back to the CAFR bookkeeping and also your share of the living man"s job-related power donated to the state by method of the loans of occupational power and building donations through registrations by the strawman. This PRE-PAID account has no money in it presently. It was prepassist when you authorized the state to end up being the trustee over it as an unselfish act of honor and duty.


You are watching: Writing a check on a closed account


See more: Why Does The Switch Respond With Startup-Config Is Not Present?

Since the Secretary of the Treasury is the fiduciary creditor to operate that account according to your draft, the Secretary of the Treasury is the only perchild who might enter a Certificate of Protest to your draft instrument seeking negotiation and closure of any type of charge that the state could carry versus your strawguy as a test of your competency as a soveregime. Sovereignty implies to serve, not to ascendancy.