It appeared choose justice. The initially third of "The Phantom," a documentary around the exoneration of a male executed in 1989 for a murder committed by someone else, could also convince you that Carlos DeLuna deserved to be discovered guilty for the murder of a young cashier called Wanda Lopez. DeLuna, then twenty years old, was arrested close to the scene, hiding from the police through cash in his pocket that almost matched the amount stolen. He was figured out by witnesses. He had a record of gaining into trouble. His brother had actually all however given up on him after DeLuna stole his truck and also took their mother"s money. And DeLuna did not do much to safeguard himself. 


His alibi was "plainly a lie." It wasn"t until the trial was undermethod that he revealed the name of the man he sassist committed the murder: Carlos Hernandez. In that part of Texas, he might also say John Smith. But the police looked right into every one of the Carlos Hernandezes that had been arrested in the location in the past ten years. None of them did it. The prosecutor dubbed DeLuna a "predator," warning the jury, "He will harm again." Determinations of guilt are based upon reasonable doubt, not absolute certainty. Finding DeLuna guilty appears reasonable.

However before, tbelow were already indications that there was even more than a reasonable doubt. Lopez was stabbed to fatality through a knife and photos of the scene present the majority of blood. But DeLuna had no blood on his clothing or shoes. While DeLuna had been in trouble before, stabbing a woguy to death "was not his manner of committing crimes." One commenter says, "the just proof is eyewitness evidence, and that"s the worst proof in the people."

Several of the human being from the community say that in instances where the victim and/or the accsupplied are Latinx, the device does not attempt as tough to discover the fact. And, as the reporter that complied with the situation on among her initially assignments claims, "there"s not always two sides to a story; sometimes there are three, four, or 5." 

The initially component of "The Phantom" could almost be a summation to the jury by the prosecution. But then we obtain the various other sides to the story, and the story as presented to us so much begins to unravel. Those eye-witnesses? "It was dark and they had actually a man in the automobile," one of them claims now. The male they witnessed wore a white shirt. The guy in the vehicle was shirtmuch less. "I probably have to have actually asked, "Wright here is his shirt?"" Sometimes we check out what we want to check out, particularly as soon as it concerns our have to find a resolution that feels comfortable and also, well, refixed. Culprit behind bars; all is well.

You are watching: Why is the phandom going to jail


The storytelling is not as compelling as in various other documentaries about exoneration or the death penalty, favor "The Thin Blue Line" or "At the Death Housage Door" (whose unforgettable central character, former Death Row chaordinary Carroll Pickett, offers a heartfelt conclusion here). The film"s re-enactments are not as effective as they attempt to be, and also some much less crucial details are given more attention than they deserve. 

And below is wbelow the a lot of controversial idea of the moment enters the story. No one mentions it explicitly in the movie, yet this film could be in the curriculum of a grad school course on Critical Race Theory, which is not, as some puzzled world insurance claim, about diversity training in corpoprice workplaces or amfinishing history books in grade college. It"s around academic study into the methods our legal mechanism perpetuates injustice alengthy racial lines rather of fighting it. 

That is wright here the film takes us next, not to a bunch of theoreticians in an ivory tower but to Columbia Law School, wright here professor James Liebman was creating about the fatality penalty in Texas. As archival footage reflects, then-Governor George W. Shrub insisted that every perkid executed was guilty after a fair trial. As Liebman"s research study confirmed on error prices in resources instances, that was not true. So he tried to find an instance and also found DeLuna. Liebmale and also his students dug into eextremely detail of the instance, also hiring a exclusive detective. As he composed, "Everypoint that can go wrong in a criminal case did." "Phantom" refers to "points that didn"t obtain found prior to." That happens far even more often as soon as the defendant (and also in this case, the victim) are negative and/or world of shade.

The main takeaway below is not that one guy was executed for a crime he did not commit, nor is it the equally disturbing failure of law enforcement to seek substantial proof that the Carlos Hernandez DeLuna named as the killer was stabbing and also raping woguys and also killing at leastern one various other. The central question concerns just how many other Carlos DeLunas and also victims of people prefer Carlos Hernandez tbelow are in the system, and also what we need to carry out to make certain they get the same chance for justice as the affluent and also effective.

Now playing in pick theaters and easily accessible on digital platforms.

See more: What Kind Of Turtle Do I Have Quiz Questions), Turtle Identification (Our 2021 In Depth Guide)


*

Nell Minow

Nell Minow reviews movies and DVDs each week as The Movie Mom virtual and also on radio stations across the US. She is the author of The Movie Mom"s Guide to Family Movies and 101 Must-See Movie Moments.