Modern CPUs consume a lot of power as a lot as 130W. That power ends up as waste warm. In impact, a modern mechanism has the tantamount of a 50W to 130W incandescent lightbulb burning constantly inside the situation. That analogy underclaims the trouble a lightbulb dissipates its warmth from the reasonably huge surconfront of the bulb. A processor must dissipate the exact same amount of warmth over the a lot smaller sized surchallenge area of the processor die, typically around 0.25 square inch. Without an effective heatsink to attract ameans this warm, the processor might literally burn itself to a crisp almost instantly.

You are watching: Why is it important to know the weight of a cooler when comparing coolers

Nearly all units address this warm trouble by placing a enormous metal heatsink in close contact through the processor die (or included warm spreader) and utilizing a little fan to draw or push air with the heat-sink fins. This gadget is dubbed a heat-sink/fan (HSF) or CPU cooler. As the power consumption of processors has continued thriving, so also has the dimension and also mass of the heatsinks they usage. Even the stock coolers packaged via retail-boxed processors nowadays are regularly fairly huge and also heavy. For instance, Figure 5-6 mirrors a stock Intel Pentium 4 CPU cooler on the left and a Thermalbest XP-120 aftermarket CPU cooler on the appropriate, with a pair of AA batteries shown for scale.


Figure 5-6: Intel stock CPU cooler (left) and also Thermalideal XP-120 CPU cooler, through AA batteries shown for scale

CPU Cooler Plumbing

Those things that look choose pipes on the Thermalappropriate XP-120 cooler are pipes. Heat pipes, to be specific. Some high-end CPU coolers, consisting of this design, use heat pipes to increase cooling performance. Heat pipes run a lot choose your refrigerator. The warm generated by the processor vaporizes a fluid. The resulting gas rises by convection up the warm pipe to the radiator section at the top of the cooler, where it condenses, offering up its warmth to the radiator.

Unchoose stock coolers, some aftersector coolers consisting of this Thermalright model do not encompass a bundled fan. That"s bereason such coolers tfinish to be offered by performance-and also silent-COMPUTER enthusiasts, who like to select a fan via certain aircirculation and also noise qualities. This Thermalright cooler have the right to usage a large (120 mm) fan, which because of its dimension deserve to run reasonably gradually (and also silently) while still offering a adequate volume of air flow to cool the processor efficiently. In truth, because of their large surconfront area and high efficiency, some high-performance afterindustry coolers, consisting of the XP-120, have the right to cool all yet the fastest, hottest processors without making use of a CPU fan. The airflow from a instance fan suffices to rerelocate waste warm from the cooler.


Do not assume that merely bereason a heatsink fits a processor, it is enough to cool that processor. Faster processors are physically the same to slower models, but produce more heat. Heatsinks are rated by processor speed. For example, a heatsink rated for a 2.4 GHz Pentium 4 have the right to physically be mounted on a 3.8 GHz Pentium 4, but is grossly inadequate to cool it. Nor have the right to you judge exclusively by processor rate. For example, Intel has actually produced 2.8 GHz Pentium 4 processors using the earlier, cooler-running Northhardwood core and the later, hotter-running Prescott-core. A heatsink rated for usage via a 2.8 GHz Northwood-core Pentium 4 is not excellent sufficient for a 2.8 GHz Prescott-core Pentium 4. Make certain that the heatsink/fan unit you pick is rated for the particular processor you usage it through.

Heatsinks are built with different materials, according to their prices and also intended uses. An inexpensive heatsink, or one intfinished for usage through a slower processor, is likely to be of all-aluminum building and construction. Aluminum is inexpensive and also relatively efficient in transferring warm. Copper is much more expensive than aluminum, yet is likewise much more effective in carrying warm. Accordingly, an extra expensive heatsink, or one intfinished for a much faster processor, could be built mostly of aluminum, but via copper surdeals with wright here the processor contacts the heatsink. The most expensive heatsinks, and also those intended for usage through the fastest processors, are constructed of pure copper.

Heatsink/fan systems also differ in the kind and also size of fan they use, and how fast that fan runs. Fan speed is an problem, because all various other things being equal, a faster-running fan produces more noise. For equal air circulation, a bigger, sreduced fan produces much less noise than a smaller sized, faster fan. Fan sizes have boosted as processor speeds have enhanced, to provide the high air circulation volume required to cool the heatsink while keeping fan speed (and noise) at a reasonable level. For example, heatsinks for Pentium II processors used 30 mm fans. Heatsinks for at an early stage Pentium 4 and Athlon 64 processors generally offered 60 mm or 70 mm fans. Some third-party "performance" heatsinks targeted at overclockers usage 80 mm, 92 mm, or 120 mm fans. Some also usage multiple fans.

In general, we recommend making use of the CPU coolers that are bundled through retail-boxed processors. The bundled coolers are primarily midselection in terms of performance and noise level neither as efficient nor as quiet as good afterindustry coolers, but less costly.

However before, if you are concerned around PC noise, a third-party CPU cooler is the way to go. You can spend anypoint from about $15 to more than $100 on a quiet CPU cooler, relying on the processor you"re making use of and simply how quiet and also effective you require the cooler to be. Arctic Cooling ( makes several models in the $15 to $30 selection that are fairly quiet and also reliable. If you"re willing to spend a bit more, look at Zalguy 7000- and 7700-series coolers (, which are in the $30 to $45 variety, and also are extremely quiet and so effective that some models can be run fanmuch less (and also therefore totally silent) via some processors. Finally, if only the finest will perform and also you"re willing to pay $60 or even more for a CPU cooler, choose a Thermalright ( model and also include among the fans recommfinished by Thermalideal.

Thermal Compound Is Critical

The best heatsink/fan can"t cool a processor effectively unless thermal compound is used at the processor/heatsink interconfront. The processor and heatsink base are both flat and also polished, yet even once they are pressed right into cshed call, a thin layer of air separates them. Air insulates well, which is the last point you want, so thermal compound is supplied to dislocation the air.

When you install a heatsink, and each time you rerelocate and relocation it, use fresh thermal compound to encertain proper warmth move. Thermal compound is obtainable in the form of viscous thermal "goop" and also as phase-change thermal pads, which melt as the processor heats up and solidify as it cools down. Make sure that the thermal compound you usage is apverified by the processor maker. For instance, AMD specifies particular phase-readjust thermal pads for particular of its processors, and also cautions that making use of any various other thermal compound voids the warranty.


We mostly use the thermal compound or phase-adjust medium that is provided via the cooler. (AMD in certain is incredibly certain around which thermal transfer media are acceptable for its processors.) When we reinstall a cooler, we mainly use Antec Silver Thermal Compound (, which is inexpensive and as great as or much better than anypoint else we"ve supplied.

The Wrong CPU Cooler Can Kill Your Motherboard

Choosing the finest afterindustry HSF is not trivial. Verifying that the cooler is rated for your processor is simply the first action. Specialty coolers those that administer high cooling performance or low noise levels, or both are frequently large and also hefty (and also expensive).

Size is necessary because the area approximately the processor socket is frequently cluttered through capacitors and other components that may prevent a large cooler from being seated properly. More than one device builder has learned to his dismay that a cooler that shows up to fit may upon being clamped down bfinish, damage, or brief out surrounding components. We have never interpreted why many third-party CPU cooler machines do not administer motherboard compatibility lists ( Zalman, for one, does). In the lack of such lists, the finest way to protect against damaging your motherboard is to verify visually that all components will certainly clear the cooler before you clamp it into area. If it does not fit well, that"s an additional great dispute for buying from sellers that have actually good return plans.

Weight is necessary because Intel and AMD specify maximum heatsink weights for which the retaining brackets for their various processors are rated. Many type of specialty CPU coolers exceed the maximum allowable weight sometimes by large margins which introduces the ugly opportunity of the cooler breaking complimentary from its mount and rattling roughly loose inside the situation. This is an issue through any tower system or various other COMPUTER that mounts the motherboard vertically, and is a certain risk through portable systems, such as LAN party PCs. AMD Socket A devices are specifically at risk to this trouble, because the cooler clamps to the CPU socket straight quite than to a retaining bracket that is secured to the motherboard.

See more: The Day Before The Day After Yesterday, The Day Before The Day Before Yesterday Is 3

The ideal solution, if you must use such a heavy cooler, is to choose one that comes with a tradition retaining bracket quite than depending on the conventional motherboard bracket. It"s likewise a good concept to deliver such systems in a motherboard horizontal orientation to mitigate the danger of breakage in the time of transit.