Crude prices are fairly easy and straightforward. They are calculated by splitting the full number of instances in a given time duration by the complete variety of persons in the population. In this instance Population B has a greater crude rate of condition. If we think around these 2 populaces as the "exposures" of interest, does this imply that it is riskier to live in Population B compared to Population A?

*

The difficulty through this compariboy is that the crude price is an as a whole average price of illness, however it doesn"t take into account possible constarting factors.

You are watching: The major disadvantage of crude rates is that

A constarting aspect is basically one more danger factor for the outcome of interemainder that is also unequally spread among the populations being compared. In this case, age is plainly an independent risk aspect for cancer mortality, yet what we really would prefer to recognize is whether there are distinctions in cancer mortality between the two populations that are not due to age distinctions, i.e., differences in mortality that are independent of age differences. If the 2 populaces have actually unequal age circulation, it will distort the comparichild of interest.

For example, Population B might have a better percentage of older civilization, and also we understand that the risk of cancer mortality increases through age regardless of one"s environment. If so, then the threat of death due to cancer in Population B can only appear to be better simply bereason it has a better percent of old world who have actually an inherently greater threat of dying. In other words, the crude mortality rate for population B might be higher simply because it is weighted even more greatly through old civilization. In this establishing we might be interested in comparing the mortality rates without the undesirable confounding effect of age.

This difficulty is clearer if we take an extra in-depth look by examining the age-specific mortality rates within each of these populations, as presented below.

Age-Specific Rates

In this hypothetical example, the table below reflects that the age-specific mortality prices are absolutely identical in the 2 populaces. In other words, in any kind of offered age group, the 2 populaces have the same risk. However before, note that the hazard of mortality boosts with age. Keep in mind also that Population B has actually a greater portion of older people. In other words, population B is more greatly weighted through older civilization, and age is additionally linked via hazard of mortality, so the comparikid of crude prices is unfair, bereason of the unequal age distributions.

See more: " Little House On The Prairie The Inheritance, The Inheritance

Table - Population A

Age Group

Number of Deaths

Number of People

Death Rate per 10,000

30-39

40-49

50-59

60-69

70-79

Totals

400

10,000

400

600

10,000

600

800

10,000

800

1,000

10,000

1,000

1,200

10,000

1,200

4,000

50,000

800

Table - Population B

Period Group

Number of Deaths

Number of People

Death Rate per 10,000

30-39

40-49

50-59

60-69

70-79

Totals

80

2,000

400

300

5,000

600

800

10,000

800

1,500

15,000

1,000

2,400

20,000

1,200

5,080

52,000

977

Because the age-particular rates are the same, the risk of cancer mortality is precisely the exact same in these 2 populations. What provides the crude prices different is that older civilization have actually a greater threat of cancer mortality, and also populace B has actually a better proportion of older world. In various other words, the age-specific prices are the exact same, but the higher proportion of older human being in populace B suggests that the all at once crude price is more greatly weighted by the age-certain rate among older people.

return to top | previous page | following page


Content ©2016. All Rights Reserved.Date last modified: June 15, 2016.Wayne W. LaMorte, MD, PhD, MPH