You hear this quote from time to time, normally supplied as some kind of creepy sound bite (a-la the Stephen King short story of that name). What is the interpretation of this expression in its original context?


“Allow” the bit kids (to approach me). “Suffer” means “permit” in this conmessage.

You are watching: Suffer the little children to come unto me meaning

Edit: The New Internationwide Version has "When Jesus experienced this, he was indignant. He sassist to them, “Let the little children come to me, and execute not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these.”


“And they carried young youngsters to Him, that He must touch them: and His disciples rebuked those that brought them. But when Jesus observed it, He was much displeased, and said unto them, Suffer the little kids to come unto Me, and forbid them not: for of such is the kingdom of God” - Mark 10:13-14

Jesus is informing his disciples to enable the children to come up to him. It’s just provided in the other means because we seldom usage “suffer” to mean “allow” these days.


*
hibernicus:

“Allow” the bit kids (to method me). “Suffer” means “permit” in this conmessage.

That’s my expertise too.

The original conmessage is the Holy bible, an occurrence that is taped in Matthew chapter 19, Mark chapter 10, and also Luke chapter 18.

The neighborhood Jews bring a bunch of little bit rugrats to see Jesus, and also his Apostles attempt to run interference, figuring that the last thing the huge boss wants is to attend to little tykes. After the youngsters crowd around him Jesus drops the ethical of the story: “Whosoever before shall not obtain the kingdom of God as a tiny kid, he shall not enter therein.”

I hope that that helps. Waves at Zsofia on ptestimonial.


The phrase “tenants at sufferance” involves mind – ‘suffer’ in the sense of enable, permit is still a traditional usage. A tenant at sufferance is ssuggest someone that does not have actually a present lease, a perkid renting month to month. Our experience as renters has actually been that landlords offer the legally compelled lease for the initially year, then continue to collect the rent without supplying to rebrand-new the lease. This implies that each month’s rent payment buys you the best to occupy your dwelling place (apartment, home, and so on.) for that month – with no assures beyond that month other than as gave by regulation. You’re occupying it at the sufferance of the landlord, that is, in exchange for rent he permits you to live tright here, without an explicit created contract, the conditions of the lease being presumed to host over on a month-to-month basis until he or you chooses to adjust them – you can move out on proper notice, and owe him nothing (various other than possible forfeiture of all or component of a damage security deposit); he can give you notification he’s raising the rent.

‘Suffer’ in this sense functions a lot favor ‘let’ – if you say, “Let’s go to the beach,” your definition is, “I indicate we go to the beach if you agree”; it’s not instructions to someone to grant permission to go, even though it sounds choose it.

Similarly, ‘suffer’ has actually traditionally carried the meaning of ‘permit, allow’ – the more widespread definition of ‘be in pain’ derives from the principle that you, or the human being in general, is permitting the person enduring (in this sense) to remain in pain, fairly than acting to alleviate it.


*
Polycarp:

‘Suffer’ in this sense functions a lot favor ‘let’

Whereas ‘let’ used to intend ‘prohibit’, as in ‘without let or hindrance’ to intend ‘without any type of barriers’.


*
Derleth:

Whereas ‘let’ provided to mean ‘prohibit’, as in ‘without let or hindrance’ to mean ‘without any barriers’.

So “Let him suffer!” would certainly have actually almost reversed in meaning over 300 years?

*


On a tangential note, I review an Ann Landers column a decade or more earlier in which the letter-writer bemoaned the decline in parenting skills among the hoi polloi these days. The letter ended with: “And experience the kids.”

What the writer supposed, of course, was “and the kids suffer.” Someexactly how the use of pseudo-classical rhetoric and also real linguistic ignorance to stake out the ethical high ground really rubbed me the wrong means, and I still can’t check out the expression “experience the children” without wishing I’d created a crackpot letter about it. Not that it would have actually completed anypoint, of course.


*
Gary_T:

Perhaps now the interpretation of the women’s suffrage activity will make more feeling to you.

I think that “suffrage” is unpertained to “enduring.”


I think that Gary T’s allude is that the “woman’s suffrage movement” describes “enable women movement”.


*
BobArrgh:

I believe that Gary T’s suggest is that the “woman’s suffrage movement” refers to “permit womales movement”.

Exactly.


There are most likely areas of the Bible belt wbelow the King James variation of the passage is cited in assistance of corporeal punishment in order to raise kids to be God-fearin’ Christians. :rolleyes:


There are most likely locations of the Bible belt where the King James version of the passage is cited in support of corpoactual punishment in order to raise children to be God-fearin’ Christians. :rolleyes:

I don’t recognize why you’d think that and also I’m not seeing any kind of assistance for it. The people here who taken the exact definition were the people who were obviously acquainted with the context of the verse. The human being that usage it conveying the wrong definition are the ones who take it out of the Biblical conmessage (Stephen King, presumably for intentional wordplay functions, and also Ann Landers, most likely not among America’s leading exponents of the New Testament).

The passage in the Bible doesn’t make a bit of sense using the various other definition. “Punish the youngsters to come unto to me?” Right after the disciples had actually been, well, trying to swat the kids away yet he rebuked them? Nah.

Nice gratuitous dig at them dumb fundy hillbillies though.


Tbelow are probably areas of the Scriptures belt where the King James variation of the passage is cited in assistance of corporeal punishment in order to raise children to be God-fearin’ Christians. :rolleyes:

Nitpick: it’s “corporal” punishment.


Nitpick: it’s “corporal” punishment.

Yeah, yet Corpdental Punishment was promoted to Major Havoc and also then General Mayhem!

*


Exactly.

But Tom Tildrum was just mentioning that the 2 words have actually almost nopoint to execute with each various other in regards to origin. ‘Suffrage’ is from sub + fragor (under + ‘sound of approval’), and ‘suffer’ comes from sub + ferre (under + carry). ‘Suffrage’ as in right to vote deserve to be attested to 1787.


But Tom Tildrum was simply stating that the two words have nearly nopoint to perform through each other in terms of beginning. ‘Suffrage’ is from sub + fragor (under + ‘sound of approval’), and ‘suffer’ originates from sub + ferre (under + carry). ‘Suffrage’ as in best to vote can be attested to 1787.

See more: Question: Does Chick Fil A Drug Test ?: Chickfila : Chickfila

Thanks for pointing that out, and my apologies to Tom Tildrum for not picking it up from his attach. I had assumed, wrongly, that the words came from the exact same root. You gentlemen have actually lessened my ignorance.