In Francine Prose"s essay "I Kcurrently Why the Caged Bird Cannot Read," why does Pincreased begin out through such strong language? Prose"s opening paragraph includes such words as appalled, dismal and also dreariness - all through negative connotations. By doing this, does Pincreased threat placing off readers who carry out not share her views?
Who are the experts?Our certified Educators are real professors, teachers, and scholars that use their scholastic expertise to tackle your toughest questions. Educators go with a rigorous application procedure, and also every answer they submit is reregarded by our in-residence editorial team.

You are watching: I know why the caged bird cannot read summary


By start her essay “I Know Why the Caged Bird Cannot Read” via exceptionally solid and also judgpsychological language, Francine Prose sucount wanted to appear as impassioned, hoswarm, forthideal, concerned, alequipped, disturbed, and also straightforward. Sudepend she wanted to “hook” her readers by making them feel immediately that her topic was essential...

Start your 48-hour totally free trial to unlock this answer and also thousands more. Enjoy ad-free and cancel anytime.

By beginning her essay “I Kcurrently Why the Caged Bird Cannot Read” with exceptionally solid and judgpsychological language, Francine Pclimbed sucount wanted to show up as impassioned, hoswarm, forthbest, concerned, alequipped, disturbed, and straightforward. Sudepend she wanted to “hook” her readers by making them feel immediately that her subject was vital and that she had actually justifiably strong views about it.

Readers not already sympathetic to Prose’s discussion, but, may be turned off by the opening of the essay (and also by the whole essay itself). They might find Prose’s tone condescending, smug, elitist, and arrogant. Writing as someone who basically agrees with much of what Pincreased claims, I have to admit that I found the tone of the essay somewhat off-putting. I was rooting for Pclimbed and also hoping that she would make a rhetorically persuasive (and logically compelling) case. Often, yet, I discovered myself feeling that she had engaged in rhetorical overkill and would not convince readers currently inclined (as I am) to agree with her. I have to confess that I winced a few times while analysis her piece. I felt that she was frequently shooting herself in her metaphorical foot.

Consider, for instance, the opening sentences of the essay:

Like a lot of parental fees who have, versus all odds, maintained a lively and still evolving passion for great books, I uncover myself, each September, increasingly appalled by the dismal lists of messages that my sons are doomed to waste a institution year analysis. What I acquire as compensation is a meacertain of insight right into why our culture has actually involved admire Montel Williams and also Ricki Lake so much more than Dante and Homer.

The expression “versus all odds” have the right to make Pincreased seem (to those inclined to agree via her) heroic in her “passion for great books,” yet to various other readers the phrase might seem hyperbolic. (Against all odds? Would “against great odds” be more persuasive?)

Likewise, those that could currently be sympathetic to Prose might admire her own “passion for excellent books,” while more doubtful readers could find this phrase somewhat self-congratulatory. The words “appalled” and also “dismal” might seem correct word choices to world as worried around fads in Amerihave the right to education and learning as Pincreased appears to be. But those very very same words could strike various other readers as a little melodramatic – designed, again, to contact attention to Prose’s own excellent taste and to mock the supposedly shabby tastes of others. Meanwhile, the word “doomed” might suggest a loving mother’s concern for the welfare of her kids, however the exact same word may aacquire strike some reader as exaggerated. Finally, the comparison between Dante and Home (on the one hand) and also Montel Williams and Ricki Lake (on the other) can seem justifiably hard-hitting to some however can strike others as overblown.

See more: Which Choice Best Expresses Why Widespread Pirating Of Goods Would Be Damaging To A Market Economy?

Much relies, of course, on the intfinished audience of Prose’s essay. If she was creating in order to stir up and also energize world who can already agree through her, then probably her pclimbed would certainly seem effective to such readers. If, however, she was hoping to readjust the minds of human being in the educational establishment, she can have been advised to take on an extra restrained and reasonable tone. Few people will certainly listen very closely and also thoughtfully to anyone who seems to be insulting them. Unfortunately, Prose runs the hazard of being tuned out even prior to her discussion has really obtained under way.